Peer Review

To promote objectivity in manuscript selection, the PJP shall employ a double-blind peer review, in which case, neither author nor reviewer is aware of each other's identity. A manusciprt shall be sent to at most two (2) peer reviewers. The peer reviewers shall decide on the merits of the manuscript using a standard evaluation form to reject, recommend revision, or accept the manuscript for publication.
A third peer reviewer may be needed as a tie-breaker in case the first two reviews are discordant or in disagreement.  Manuscripts with statistical analysis shall be sent routinely to a statistician.  Manuscripts with radiologic figures shall be sent routinely to a radiologist. 

The Editor-in-Chief shall make the final deliberation after considering all reviews, editorial board recommendations and statistician comments.

You may want to download the PJP Guide for Reviewers on using the online journal system to guide you.